Return fraud has become a multi‑billion‑dollar problem for U.S. retailers. According to a joint Appriss Retail and Deloitte report, Americans returned an estimated $685 billion worth of merchandise in 2024—about 13.2% of total retail sales—with fraudulent or abusive returns accounting for approximately 15.1% of that, costing retailers a staggering $103 billion in losses. Online channels are particularly vulnerable: 24.5% of e‑commerce purchases are returned, compared with just 8.7% in physical stores, making online fraud roughly three times more common than in‑store abuse.
The tactics behind return fraud run the gamut—from “wardrobing,” where consumers use products briefly before returning them, to empty‑box scams and price‑switching. Nearly half of surveyed retailers reported encountering returns of stolen merchandise, while 60% cited instances of wardrobing, and 55% dealt with fake or stolen‑tender returns. Compounding the problem, modern discount cases, including scams facilitated through platforms like Telegram, have given rise to organized, high‑volume fraud rings targeting major retailers with sophisticated techniques like fake returns and manipulated shipping labels.
Retailers are fighting back by deploying data‑driven combat strategies. Many are tightening policies—such as imposing return windows, enforcing “no receipt, no return” rules, and charging fees for frequent returners—but face a delicate balance between fraud control and customer satisfaction. Advanced tools leveraging AI and machine learning are gaining popularity; industry leaders recommend flagging high‑risk return behavior, enforcing segmented policies for serial returners, and embedding fraud‑detection systems in the reverse logistics process rather than relying on manual reviews. Some retailers even offer “returnless refunds” for low‑value items, reducing processing costs while quietly monitoring reuse abuse.
While minimizing return abuse is essential, experts caution against becoming overly restrictive. According to the National Retail Federation, generous return policies remain a key driver of consumer loyalty, as 76% of shoppers expect free returns, and a negative experience would deter purchase decisions. The future lies in smarter detection—not blanket limits—where retailers use analytics to personalize policies: trusting honest shoppers while stopping fraudsters effectively.
References
https://www.apprissretail.com/insights/2024-consumer-returns-in-the-retail-industry
https://www.emarketer.com
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Return_fraud
https://www.shipnetwork.com/post/battling-returns-abuse-how-online-merchants-can-stay-ahead-of-the-growing-returns-problem
https://www.thescxchange.com
https://www.digitalcommerce360.com
https://www.stampedwithlove.com
https://www.optoro.com
https://apnews.com
https://www.loopreturns.com/blog/ecommerce-returns-fraud-refund-fraud-details-examples
https://www.liquidonate.com
https://ekata.com/resource/return-fraud-the-100-billion-problem-facing-retailers
https://www.retaildive.com
https://www.chainstoreage.com
https://www.the-sun.com
https://www.wsj.com
https://nypost.com